The Blues Scale is a Compromise

The generic guitar lesson on the “blues scale” goes something like this: take the minor pentatonic, add a passing tone between the 4 and 5, and you’ve got the blues scale. This is also referred to as the minor blues scale.

A C D (D# / Eb) E G

That’s a good starting point, and it’s not wrong, but it is an oversimplification that can shape how guitarists think about the blues for years. Without some exploration on the students’ part, an entire sonic landscape is missed.

What the Blues Scale Approximates

The blue notes – the sounds that give the blues its character – are not necessarily fretted pitches. They’re inflections. Microtonal shadings that fall between the notes of twelve-tone equal temperament. Open Music Theory describes them as pitches that “split the difference” between the major and minor form of a scale degree. Singers can access these shadings naturally because their instruments allow continuous pitch. Guitarists can reach them through bending, but only if they know what they’re going for. It’s not as simple as just putting your finger on a fret, you have to listen. It’s the same principle as learning how to bend in tune.

When the blues scale is written on a page, it functions as a starting point. It flattens microtonal expression into the nearest available pitches in Western tuning. It’s a useful approximation, but treating it as the thing itself is like reading a transcript of a conversation and thinking you’ve heard the tone of voice.

Why the Pattern Approach Fails

When the blues scale is taught as a box pattern, students learn where to put their fingers. But you also need to know that it’s a chromatic passing tone, a note between the fourth and fifth that got frozen into a fret position.

Knowing this can change how you think about the note. When it’s understood as a passing note, it gets treated differently. You can bend into it or slide through it. But normally you don’t stay on it.

Note: This doesn’t apply when you have a bVI7 chord. That’s another post for another day though.

The same applies to the flat third. Played as a fixed fret position, it sounds like minor pentatonic. Bent slightly sharp, released slowly, it creates a tension that is idiomatic of the blues. You may not know it when you hear it, but you will probably notice it when it’s not done right. Sometimes it makes the blues sound too…pretty.

The Major/Minor Ambiguity

One of the defining features of the blues is the coexistence of major and minor thirds. A blues in A will have a singer bending around C/C# while the guitar plays an A7 with a clear C#. This isn’t a mistake

The six-note blues scale doesn’t capture this. It only contains the flat third. The tension between major and minor is invisible in the pattern. A guitarist who only knows the box shape has no framework for understanding why the C# sounds right, because the scale they learned says the third is flat.

The Composite Blues Scale

There’s another way out of the six-note compromise: don’t pick one scale. Use both.

The minor blues scale you already know is 1, ♭3, 4, ♭5, 5, ♭7. The major blues scale is 1, 2, ♭3, 3, 5, 6: the major pentatonic with a ♭3 added. Already, in that single six-note collection, the minor and major thirds sit side by side, ready to be played against each other or bent through.

When you stack the two on the same root (I’ve heard it with several names, I will use composite blues scale for now. Personally, I think of it as just the blues scale)— a nine-note collection that’s Mixolydian with the ♭3 and ♭5 added. In G it’s G, A, B♭, B, C, D♭, D, E, F. That’s not a scale you run up and down. The major 3 and minor 3 are both in there. So is the passing tone between 4 and 5. The natural sixth and the flat seventh coexist.

I can confidently say that most of the people you’re listening to playing the blues aren’t thinking about switching between major and minor scales. They draw from this collection, weaving in and out of the two tonalities intuitively, based solely on what they hear in their head.

Notice what this means for the standard six-note blues scale. It only gives you the minor side, ♭3, ♭5, ♭7, with no major 3 or natural 6 in sight. The friction between major and minor on the same root requires both halves to function. The textbook scale gives you half the vocabulary and calls it the language.

Minor Melody Over Major Harmony

The other half of the picture is what’s happening underneath. In a blues, the chords are typically dominant sevenths: I7, IV7, V7. Dominant chords contain a major third. So when a player solos with the minor blues scale they’re playing a minor third over a chord that contains a major third.

In almost any other tonal context, this would sound like a mistake. Not here.

This is what gives the blues its harmonic identity. The major/minor friction is the central expressive resource. The composite blues scale is one way of cataloging it. Microtonal bending between the major and minor third is another. Both are attempts to describe the same phenomenon: music that lives in the gap between major and minor rather than choosing one.

Conclusion

When you learn the blues scale as a six-note pattern, you get a starting point, not the thing itself. There is more to it.

The blues isn’t a scale. The textbook six-note minor blues scale is one approximation. The major blues scale is another. The composite is wider still. None of them is the music. The music comes from how you use the notes.

But I don’t need to ramble on, listen to some of these. All great recordings. All very different.

Joe Pass
Lightnin’ Hopkins
Thelonious Monk
Buddy Guy & Junior Wells
Kelly Joe Phelps
Jimi Hendrix


Comments

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Brendan Bondurant

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading